HACKING FINGERPRINT

hallow, how are you all ?
today i will show you how to hack fingerprint software .
off course you have a few question about that.
actually i am showing this for all user who use nokia symbian s60(all editions touch) phone.
you can download this software from google search.
this software is flexible for use. but sometimes user fall a problem with this apps.
you can set beep number on this apps that by completing how many beep if a user move away his finger then it will be unlock.
but i will show you a different solution .you may unlock this without any beep or finger touch .
for that

1.you can turn your display lock switch twitch freequently(very fast).
hope you may got your phone unlocked.

2.you can also unlock your phone by this way.for that you need to touch the display shortcut (while your phone are locked) and press it .if it appears those shortcut you may select one and get your phone unlocked.you can also touch other part of your screen to get your phone unlocked and to stay at home(on your phone).
thanks for reading .
if you like this please help us through your social sharing and comments.

Read More

Facebook's email switch prompts criticism by users

Facebook is facing a backlash from users after replacing email addresses listed in members' contacts with those provided by its @facebook.com system.

The company said it had acted to make details "consistent" across its site.
If Facebook's email system takes off it could drive more traffic to the firm's pages helping boost advertising sales.
But some users have branded the move "annoying" and "lame" and publicised instructions on how to display original addresses instead of the Facebook ones.
Facebook first announced plans for the move in April, although the news attracted little attention at the time.
"We are providing every Facebook user with his or her own Facebook email address because we find that many users find it useful to connect with each other, but using Facebook email is completely up to you," said a statement from the company.
Emails sent to @facebook.com addresses appear alongside posts sent via the network's internal message system, allowing users to pick up both types of communication from the same place.

Annoyed users

One analyst told the BBC the effort could backfire.
"It reeks of the same move Google did with its Buzz product when it automatically opted people in, and users recoiled against the action," said Anthony Mullen, interactive marketing analyst at Forrester Research.
"This is a direction Facebook needs to move in - your email is a proxy for your identity on the internet and Facebook want to usurp people's pre-existing email identities with their own to help drive up traffic to its site and lock users into its service.
"The problem is the lack of transparency - it has acted without asking for members' permission first."
Messages posted to the rival social network Twitter suggested the move had annoyed some users.
"Warnings would have been nice Facebook, don't just go and change email addresses,"
"More stunningly bad work from Facebook,"
"Good idea to get people to use it. Poorly executed!!!"
Few messages supported the move.
Users wishing to undo the change can do so by clicking on the "about" link in their profile and then clicking the "edit" button next to their contact information.
They then need to click make their Facebook email address "hidden from timeline" and then - if they wish - make one or more of their other preferred addresses visible.

Read More

Internet piracy appeal fee challenged by Consumer Focus

 

Suspected internet pirates will have 20 working days to appeal against allegations of copyright infringement

and must pay £20 to do so, according to revised plans to enforce the UK's Digital Economy Act.

The details are contained in secondary legislation presented to Parliament and a draft code published by Ofcom.
The telecoms regulator said it expected the scheme to begin in 2014.
Campaigners oppose the fee saying users should be innocent until proven guilty.
The Creative Industries Minister, Ed Vaizey, said: "We must ensure our creative industries can protect their investment.
"They have the right to charge people to access their content if they wish, whether in the physical world or on the internet."
Three letters Under the plans users suspected of accessing or uploading illegally copied files will be sent letters from their internet service provider (ISP), delivered at least one month apart, informing them they are suspected of copyright infringement.
The messages will also contain information about where to find licensed material online.
Copyright owners can request details about all the accusations made against any account-holder who receives three or more letters within a 12-month period, but the user's name will not be revealed at this stage.

Expect plenty more arguments before we finally discover whether the Digital Economy Act really has the potential to be as good for the creative industries or as bad for the consumer as the different lobbies claim.
Meanwhile you could argue that the whole enterprise already looks obsolete.
The copyright holders have found that existing laws enable them to take action against piracy sites, with court rulings forcing ISPs to block access to Newzbin and the Pirate Bay.

Rights holders wishing to chase a suspected pirate must seek a court order requiring the ISP to hand over the details.

Ofcom said this additional step was designed to encourage efforts to be focused "on the most persistent alleged infringers".
Appeal fees Accused users who wish to appeal against the claims outlined in any letter must pay £20 to do so, but the revised code says only grounds specified in the act will be considered.
Campaign group Consumer Focus chief executive Mike O'Connor said: "Copyright infringement is not to be condoned, but people who are innocent should not have to pay a fee to challenge accusations.
"Twenty pounds may sound like a small sum, but it could deter those living on low-incomes from challenging unfair allegations."
He added the best way to reduce unnecessary appeals was for Ofcom to require a high standard of evidence from copyright holders to avoid notifications being sent out on the basis of "flimsy evidence".
Ofcom noted its revised code stated rights holders would only be able to gather evidence using measures approved by the regulator.
Punishments ISPs - who must also contribute to the cost of running the scheme - will ultimately be required to take steps against repeat offenders such as limiting their broadband speed or suspending their accounts.
However, Ofcom noted this would require further legislation that could only be considered after the letter scheme had been in force for a year.
Even so, members of the Creative Coalition Campaign, welcomed the latest step towards implementing the copyright crackdown.
"We urge ISPs to begin building their systems now and to work constructively with rights holders, Ofcom and government to get notice-sending up and running as soon as possible," said John Smith, general secretary of the Musicians' Union.

Read More